2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo V50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo V50 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo V50 (217 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 105 kg more than 2003 Volvo V50.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo V50 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia K2700 | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Kia | Volvo |
| Model | K2700 | V50 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2665 cc | 2524 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1425 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 62 L |
