2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 500 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | K2700 | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1030 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |