2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia K2700 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Kia | Mazda |
| Model | K2700 | 3 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 2665 cc | 2258 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1125 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |
