2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia K2700 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Kia | Ford |
| Model | K2700 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2665 cc | 4000 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3193 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 74 L |
