2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Eos

To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 89 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volkswagen Eos (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.

Compare all specifications: