2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 226 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Kia | Cadillac |
Model | K2700 | CTS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1756 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |