2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2011 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pixo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia K2700 | 2011 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | K2700 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 2665 cc | 996 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 68 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2360 mm |
