2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2012 Audi A1
To start off, 2012 Audi A1 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A1 (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A1 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 490 kg more than 2012 Audi A1.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A1 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 2012 Audi A1 | |
Make | Kia | Audi |
Model | K2700 | A1 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1968 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1040 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 34 L |