2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Kia | Holden |
Model | K2700 | Cruze |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2685 mm |