2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 406 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Kia K2700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.

Compare all specifications: