2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (101 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 79 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia K2700 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Kia | Volvo |
| Model | K2700 | C30 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1600 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 101 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |
