2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Kia K2700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Compass (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia K2700 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Kia | Jeep |
| Model | K2700 | Compass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 2665 cc | 2400 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.5 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 97 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1520 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2634 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 51 L |
