2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 152 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | K2700 | 3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 91 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1378 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |