2005 Kia Optima vs. 1961 Mini MK I
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1961 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1961 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Optima weights approximately 882 kg more than 1961 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Optima (199 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Optima | 1961 Mini MK I | |
Make | Kia | Mini |
Model | Optima | MK I |
Year Released | 2005 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 847 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 60 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2040 mm |