2005 Kia Optima vs. 1972 Rover P5B
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Optima (170 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1972 Rover P5B. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover P5B. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover P5B weights approximately 103 kg more than 2005 Kia Optima.
Because 1972 Rover P5B is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover P5B. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover P5B (295 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Optima. (245 Nm). This means 1972 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Optima | 1972 Rover P5B | |
| Make | Kia | Rover |
| Model | Optima | P5B |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 2670 cc | 3528 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 295 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1487 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2820 mm |
