2005 Kia Optima vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Optima weights approximately 332 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Optima (199 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (159 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Optima | 1982 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Kia | Plymouth |
Model | Optima | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 159 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2630 mm |