2005 Kia Optima vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Optima (170 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Kia Optima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Optima | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Kia | Ford |
| Model | Optima | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
