2005 Kia Optima vs. 1992 Volvo 460
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 460 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 460. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 460. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Optima weights approximately 447 kg more than 1992 Volvo 460. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Optima (199 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Volvo 460. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Volvo 460.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Optima | 1992 Volvo 460 | |
Make | Kia | Volvo |
Model | Optima | 460 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |