2005 Kia Optima vs. 2002 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 673 more horse power than 2005 Kia Optima. (170 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Optima weights approximately 401 kg more than 2002 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2002 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 749 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Optima. (241 Nm). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Optima | 2002 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Kia | Lotec |
Model | Optima | C 1000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 241 Nm | 990 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1487 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1150 mm |