2005 Kia Optima vs. 2002 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Samsung SM3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Samsung SM3 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Optima (170 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2002 Samsung SM3. (95 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2002 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Optima weights approximately 327 kg more than 2002 Samsung SM3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Optima (241 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Optima | 2002 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | Kia | Samsung |
| Model | Optima | SM3 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 241 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1487 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2540 mm |
