2005 Kia Optima vs. 2002 Tata E
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Tata E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Tata E would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Kia Optima. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Tata E should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Optima weights approximately 127 kg more than 2002 Tata E.
Because 2002 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Tata E (210 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Optima. (199 Nm). This means 2002 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Optima | 2002 Tata E | |
Make | Kia | Tata |
Model | Optima | E |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2360 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 199 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2810 mm |