2005 Kia Optima vs. 2011 Buick Enclave
To start off, 2011 Buick Enclave is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Optima would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Buick Enclave is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Buick Enclave (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2005 Kia Optima. (170 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Buick Enclave should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Buick Enclave weights approximately 681 kg more than 2005 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Buick Enclave (366 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Optima. (241 Nm). This means 2011 Buick Enclave will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Optima | 2011 Buick Enclave | |
Make | Kia | Buick |
Model | Optima | Enclave |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 241 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1487 kg | 2168 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2007 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3020 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.9 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 83 L |