2005 Kia Optima vs. 2012 Fiat Croma

To start off, 2012 Fiat Croma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Optima would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Fiat Croma. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2012 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Croma weights approximately 98 kg more than 2005 Kia Optima.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Fiat Croma (280 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Optima. (199 Nm). This means 2012 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Optima.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Kia Optima 2012 Fiat Croma
Make Kia Fiat
Model Optima Croma
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2360 cc 1910 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 138 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 199 Nm 280 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87.1 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 90.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 18.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1497 kg 1595 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1610 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.4 L/100km 6.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 62 L