2005 Kia Optima vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Optima would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Optima weights approximately 327 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Optima | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Optima | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 2.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 1.9 L/100km |