2005 Kia Optima vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Optima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Optima would be higher. At 2,670 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Optima (170 HP) has 91 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Optima (245 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Optima | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Optima | Micra |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2670 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 46 L |
