2005 Kia Retona vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2005 Kia Retona is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Nissan Bluebird (104 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2005 Kia Retona. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Retona weights approximately 700 kg more than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2005 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Retona (205 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (162 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Retona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Retona | 1983 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Retona | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2560 mm |