2005 Kia Retona vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Retona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Retona would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Retona (91 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Retona should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2005 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Retona | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Retona | Pixo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2360 mm |