2005 Kia Rio vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Kia Rio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Rio (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Rio weights approximately 45 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Rio (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Rio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Rio | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Kia | Riley |
Model | Rio | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 25 L |