2005 Kia Rio vs. 1976 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2005 Kia Rio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,341 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Rio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Rio (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 16 kg more than 2005 Kia Rio.
Because 1976 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Rio (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Rio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Rio | 1976 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Kia | Zastava |
Model | Rio | 1300 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 1341 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 944 kg | 960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2430 mm |