2005 Kia Rio vs. 1978 Zastava 132
To start off, 2005 Kia Rio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Kia Rio. (104 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Rio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Rio weights approximately 15 kg more than 1978 Zastava 132.
Because 1978 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Zastava 132 (142 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Rio. (141 Nm). This means 1978 Zastava 132 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Rio | 1978 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Kia | Zastava |
| Model | Rio | 132 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2560 mm |
