2005 Kia Sedona vs. 1972 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2005 Kia Sedona is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Sedona (195 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1972 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1972 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Sedona weights approximately 968 kg more than 1972 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Sedona (296 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Sedona | 1972 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Kia | NSU |
Model | Sedona | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 162 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2178 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 37 L |