2005 Kia Sedona vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Kia Sedona is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Sedona (195 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Sedona weights approximately 1248 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Sedona (296 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Sedona | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Sedona | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 112 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2178 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2390 mm |