2005 Kia Sedona vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS
To start off, 2005 Kia Sedona is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSS would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Sedona (195 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. (162 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Sedona weights approximately 182 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Sedona (296 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. (270 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Sedona | 2000 Mitsubishi SSS | |
Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Sedona | SSS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3489 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2087 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 71 L |