2005 Kia Sedona vs. 2012 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2012 Renault Trafic is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Sedona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Sedona would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Sedona (195 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2012 Renault Trafic. (100 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Sedona should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Trafic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Sedona (296 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Trafic. (241 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Sedona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Trafic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Sedona | 2012 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | Sedona | Trafic |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 241 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 90 L |