2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 370 kg more than 1946 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Kia | Volvo |
Model | Shuma II | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1946 |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2850 mm |