2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 1195 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Kia | Saab |
Model | Shuma II | 92 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2480 mm |