2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik (169 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Talbot Saoutchik should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 200 kg more than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik.
Because 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
Make | Kia | Talbot |
Model | Shuma II | Saoutchik |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 4480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3160 mm |