2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1964 Morris Mini Moke
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Mini Moke. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Mini Moke would be higher. At 1,791 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (111 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 1437 kg more than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Shuma II (155 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Shuma II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Morris Mini Moke.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 1964 Morris Mini Moke | |
| Make | Kia | Morris |
| Model | Shuma II | Mini Moke |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1791 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2087 kg | 650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2040 mm |
