2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1964 Sunbeam Imp
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Imp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Imp would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 1253 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Imp.
Because 1964 Sunbeam Imp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Sunbeam Imp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 1964 Sunbeam Imp | |
Make | Kia | Sunbeam |
Model | Shuma II | Imp |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 875 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 27 L |