2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 138 kg more than 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Kia | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Shuma II | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1593 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1958 kg | 1820 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3130 mm |
