2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1967 Renault 4
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 1350 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 1967 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Kia | Renault |
| Model | Shuma II | 4 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 38 L |
