2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,593 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (101 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 1198 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Shuma II (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Shuma II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Kia | Suzuki |
Model | Shuma II | Fronte |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 35 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1958 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 66 L |