2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1969 Reliant Scimitar

To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Reliant Scimitar (123 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Reliant Scimitar should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 768 kg more than 1969 Reliant Scimitar.

Because 1969 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Reliant Scimitar (266 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1969 Reliant Scimitar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Kia Shuma II 1969 Reliant Scimitar
Make Kia Reliant
Model Shuma II Scimitar
Year Released 2005 1969
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1593 cc 2992 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 101 HP 123 HP
Torque 148 Nm 266 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1958 kg 1190 kg
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2540 mm