2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Nissan Cedric (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 244 kg more than 2005 Kia Shuma II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1975 Nissan Cedric (179 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1975 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Shuma II | Cedric |
Year Released | 2005 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1792 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |