2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1979 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,593 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (101 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1979 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 1078 kg more than 1979 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Shuma II (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Shuma II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 1979 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Kia | Seat |
Model | Shuma II | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1958 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2460 mm |