2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,593 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (101 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 1078 kg more than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Shuma II (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Shuma II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Shuma II | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1958 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2420 mm |