2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1983 Reliant SE6

To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Reliant SE6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Reliant SE6 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Reliant SE6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Reliant SE6 (133 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Reliant SE6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 708 kg more than 1983 Reliant SE6.

Because 1983 Reliant SE6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Reliant SE6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Reliant SE6 (233 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1983 Reliant SE6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.

Compare all specifications: