2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V would be higher.
Because 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia Shuma II has manual transmission. 2005 Kia Shuma II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V | |
| Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Shuma II | HSR-V |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
