2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (109 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 855 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 157 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Shuma II | 626 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 157 Nm |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2620 mm |