2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (111 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Shuma II | FTO |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1791 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2510 mm |
